To give an example, I was on the phone with my client when she made an important discovery. I was so glad she didn’t ask me to do anything but show her what I learned.
In an article in the February, 2013 issue of the Harvard Business Review, the authors write about how their research indicates “conformity can be more effective when it is done with a group rather than an individual.” They went on to describe “conformity” as “the group’s collective and systematic efforts to produce a common purpose,” as it is the “most prominent of the group’s internal mechanisms.
The researchers went on to explain that they found that the conformity group is a team and that the group is more effective than an individual. This is another way of saying that the group is more influential than an individual. Therefore you have to be a part of a group to really benefit from conformity.
The study explained that it takes about 10 minutes for a group of people to converge on one single point, so it is likely that if one group wanted to form a group that one of us would be the right person to lead the group for this reason.
For the study, a group of people went over to one of two places on the university campus. One of the places was an office complex where the group was placed in a room together with two people. Another place was a large room in the center of the room where the group was not placed. During the study, each person was told that he or she was an individual, and that the other person was a member of the group.
The first condition was that the group should be “conformed” to the group leader. To conform is to be the same as the other group members. To be different is to be the opposer to the group leader. To be the same as the group leader is to form a group of the same type as the group leader. The second condition is that the group leader should have the same personality as the people he or she is trying to conjoin.
The first condition is that the group leader should have the same personality as the people she tries to conjoin with. The second condition is that the group leader should have the same personality as the people the group tries to conjoin with.
When people think of conformity, they’re probably imagining the group leader’s ideal self. Of course, this is not the actual ideal self of the group leader. However, the ideal self of an individual is the person who has the same actions and thoughts as the person the individual is trying to conjoin. The second condition is that the group leader should have the same actions and thoughts as the people the group tries to conjoin with.
The second condition is the one that causes the largest amount of trouble for organizations. The third condition is the one that can be the most easily broken.
If you’re looking to increase the conformity of your group, the first condition is likely to be the most important. While there’s a lot of research that supports the idea that conformity increases under the conditions outlined above, the second condition is one of the most controversial. Because it seems that the only people who conform to the group are the ones who are trying to join it.
